Why E&O insurance is a continuing concern for tax pros
Consider this common scenario: A client questions the tax treatment of an item reported based on the information they provided. When the IRS assesses additional tax and penalties, the client claims the issue should have been handled differently and seeks reimbursement. What begins as a routine filing question can escalate into a formal dispute, exposing the preparer to legal risks that E&O insurance can help mitigate.
What E&O insurance actually covers
Is E&O insurance required?
For example, California requires E&O insurance or other qualifying financial security for certain licensed business entities operating as limited liability companies (LLCs), but it does not impose an E&O requirement on all LLCs or all tax preparers. Because state rules vary, tax professionals should review applicable licensing or business entity requirements in their own state.
Many firms opt for E&O insurance as a standard risk-management measure, not because it is mandated, but because client expectations and the risk environment have evolved.
For sole practitioners and small firms, the lack of a universal requirement often leads to uncertainty about whether coverage is necessary. This uncertainty is precisely why the issue continues to come up.
Why E&O insurance keeps coming up now
- Increased complexity in tax law: Recent years have introduced new credits, deductions, relief programs, amended filings and court case outcomes, all of which can increase audit and enforcement risks when relied upon or executed improperly.
- Rising IRS enforcement: More scrutiny means more chances for clients to challenge outcomes when refunds are not as expected or projected.
- Shifting client expectations: Many taxpayers now assume that unfavorable results must be caused by a preparer's error, even when the issue stems from incomplete information or later IRS interpretation.
- Expanded practice risks: Situations such as remote work and seasonal contractor arrangements add exposure for firms that didn’t face these risks in the past.
A planning question, not just an insurance question
That same proactive mindset applies to tax professionals. Understanding what E&O insurance covers (and doesn’t) helps practitioners assess their own risk with the same careful thought they apply when advising clients.
Common misconceptions that surface in tax pro discussions
- Small client base limits exposure: A single claim can still result in significant legal costs.
- Seasonal work eliminates the need for year-round coverage: Claims may arise months or years after a return is filed.
- Software tools or engagement letters replace professional liability: These tools are helpful but don't negate the need for coverage.
- Reimbursing a client resolves the issue: In some cases, reimbursement may be enough. In others, disputes can escalate, especially if penalties or interest are involved.
Cost and coverage considerations
The key isn't to find a one-size-fits-all solution, but to ensure that coverage aligns with your practice's unique risks. Important considerations include policy exclusions, defense coverage, and how contractors or seasonal staff are treated. Periodically reviewing your coverage ensures it keeps pace with changes in your practice, not just your business size.
Bringing E&O back to practice management
NATP provides education and trusted partner resources to help members make informed practice management decisions. Its partnership with InterWest Insurance Services connects tax professionals with an experienced E&O insurance broker, giving them the information they need to evaluate coverage options without pressure or guesswork.