Skip to nav Skip to content
{{ headerItems.greeting }} {{ headerItems.firstName }} Log In
{{ itemUpdatedMessage }}

Choose the right outsourcing fit for your tax practice

Published:
By: NATP Staff
Tax professional evaluating domestic vs international outsourcing for staffing shortages and compliance under IRS §7216

Outsourcing is no longer a “big firm” luxury it’s a lifeline for tax professionals facing chronic staffing shortages. However, once you decide to outsource, a significant question arises: Should you hire domestically or go international? 

The domestic advantage 

Domestic outsourced staff work within the United States, usually no more than three time zones away. Advantages include: 

  • Cultural familiarity 
  • Strong English skills (though not always a primary language)
  • Similar work hours
  • Easier compliance with certain U.S. regulations

What would be the challenge? 

  • The U.S. talent pool is smaller and more competitive.
  • Wage demands are higher. 
  • Staff turnover can be higher as workers leave for better paying jobs.

For firms that value cultural alignment and real-time communication above all else, domestic outsourcing isa viable option. 

The international edge

International outsourcing opens your practice to a much larger talent pool often with significant cost saving.

The benefits include:

➢ Lower labor costs – Allowing you to reinvest savings into technology or client services
➢ Highly motivated talent eager for U.S. work experience
➢ Flexibility to choose working hours that align with your needs (including overnight shifts for next-day delivery). 

However, international outsourcing has considerations: 

➢ Time zone differences (could be a plus or minus) 
➢ Cultural and holiday differences
➢ English proficiency that varies by region

Compliance spotlights under IRS §7216

Whether domestic or international, IRS §7216 is nonnegotiable. This regulation requires tax preparers to get explicit client consent before sharing tax return information with a third party and the rules are even stricter for sharing information outside the U.S. 

When information is transferred outside the U.S., the rules become stricter, and disclosures must include details about where and how data will be accessed. This also applies if a U.S.-based preparer is working from abroad at the time.

The hybrid approach 

Many firms choose a blend:

  • Domestic staff for high-touch, client-facing, or compliance-heavy tasks
  • International staff for high-volume, process-driven work like data entry or reconciliations

This balance offers the speed and cost savings of international outsourcing alongside the cultural alignment and regulatory ease of domestic hires. It also provides flexibility to adjust staffing based on seasonal workload fluctuations. 

Making the choice

The “right” choice depends on your firm’s:

  • Budget
  • Task complexity
  • Compliance risk tolerance
  • Communication preferences

Whatever you choose, be sure to vet providers thoroughly by checking their security protocols, training processes, and references from other firms in your network. 

The bottom line

Outsourcing is not only a staffing strategy; it’s a growth strategy. Choosing between domestic, international, or a hybrid approach comes down to balancing cost, compliance, and communication. 

By defining your needs clearly, understanding the trade-offs, and thoroughly vetting potential partners, you can develop a staffing model that supports your firm’s growth, protects your team’s well-being, and delivers consistent, high-quality results to your clients.

About the author(s)

"NATP team committed to supporting tax professionals with expert insights, industry updates, and resources, shown with green triangle design element representing the organization's brand.

NATP Staff

The NATP team is dedicated to supporting tax professionals with expert insights, industry updates, and resources that help them serve their clients with confidence.

Information included in this article is accurate as of the publication date. This post does not reflect tax law changes or IRS guidance that may have occurred after the publishing date.

Loading content...